A financial integrity check reviews relevant public-record information to identify financial risk indicators such as county court judgments (CCJs) bankruptcies, individual voluntary arrangements, decrees and sequestration orders. It helps employers assess financial conduct where this is relevant to the role.

No, this check do not access bank accounts, review spending behaviour or assess a candidate’s credit score. Instead it focuses on specific public-record findings that may be relevant to role suitability, regulatory requirements or positions of trust.

They are most relevant for roles involving financial responsibility, access to sensitive data, regulated activity, client money, procurement, governance or other positions of trust. They should be used where financial conduct is proportionate and relevant to the role being screened.

Financial checks typically review a six-year period, reflecting how long records such as CCJs and similar public-record findings usually remain accessible. The exact scope should align with the screening package, role requirements and any relevant sector expectations.

Yes. Candidates should be informed that financial integrity checks form part of the screening process before the check begins. This supports transparency and helps ensure the screening process remains fair, proportionate and clearly communicated.

Findings should be considered in context and assessed against the responsibilities and risks of the role. A financial record does not automatically mean a candidate is unsuitable, but it may need to be reviewed alongside role requirements, regulatory obligations and any explanation provided by the candidate.